The gloves are off folks.
Do you KNOW what is going on in this world?

Housekeeping first:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights | Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

UNFUNDED Doctors collaborating all around the world to expose the truth are being silenced. LISTEN to them.

Part 1 (only 27 minutes, please watch)

Part 2 (54 minutes) in response to the “Antivaxxer” bashing from msm after Pt 1 was launched.

Dr Sherr! Tenpenny explains the immediate and more importantly AFTER effects of the jab. Do your own research!! It’s there if you want to KNOW.


Did you ever wonder why the “government” never promote any treatments, good food or exercise, sunshine, anything that would treat or prevent symptoms of cv and build natural immunity?
They banned HCQ, made it illegal for MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS to prescribe, even though it has been PROVEN  to SAVE lives.
Another readily available, safe and cheap treatment is available… do you hear about it from the “government” or the “Chief Medical Officer”?

“Treat the severely ill; skip the problematic vaccines
Vaccination is not fool proof. Vaccinated patients are testing positive for COVID-19. Doctors can choose to treat the 3 in 10,000 COVID-19 severely infected patients who are at risk for a mortal outcome with lysine rather than needlessly vaccinate billions of people. Mass vaccination would not be needed, nor would lockdowns, quarantines and questionable mass face mask use be required.
The pandemic would be rapidly extinguished by a public information campaign regarding lysine-rich foods and dietary supplements. The public can take action on its own today without adverse consequences. Literally, trillions of dollars would be saved worldwide. If not for COVID-19, at least for herpes infections.
The shame is on the World Health Organization with a budget of $8.482 billion or the Centers For Disease Control with a budget of $7.875 billion that overlook safe and economical cures like lysine. This report serves as evidence the world is being gamed to plunder the masses of their health and wealth.
The people of the world need to stop heeding advice from public health officials and practice preventive medicine on their own volition.
What about Gates (and complete immunity from prosecution), GAVI, the WHO and the UN? Well, you should know.

The patents of cv and cv testing and detection


Your voice

Are you willing to accept an injection of untested experimental gene therapy treatment?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We’ll get back to “Emergency Use” shortly, but first, watch this.
Aluminium nanoparticles used as delivery agents in vacc!ines.
This video had to be recorded by a phone as it has been blocked and banned from all platforms.

The PCR test

Preamble by Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test.

Medical professionals on masks

Americas Frontline Doctors Alliance on masks

Phds, Professors talk about the “vacc!ne”

Professor Dolores Cah!ll explains how the mRNA gene therapy interacts with the body’s own immune system, and how your body may attack you from within. UNTESTED, EXPERIMENTAL gene therapies, not “vacc!nes”. Read, research, LEARN for your kid’s futures.

“Among people over 80, maybe about 2.5% will experience severe side effects, adverse events where people cannot work or live life normally.

Then with the 2nd vaccination it could be 1 in 10 or ten percent.  For the over 80-year-olds, I would think that 80% of them would have life-limiting reactions or die when they come across the messenger RNA again.

For others (not elderly) it could be half of the people who could be severely harmed.

What it does is… this gene therapy or medical device is setting up an autoimmune disease chronically.  It’s like injecting people who have nut allergies with peanuts.”

OK, so where are the test results to disprove this you should ask. There aren’t any. The VAERS data supports the quotation above by Professor Cah!ll.

  • The initial vacc!ne trials were conducted on 100% healthy, mostly under 70yrs, specifically NOT on aged, frail, or any candidate with a pre-existing condition causing low immunity.
  • The “trial” is being rolled out as they vacc!nate the population. Living guinea pigs.
  • The most adversely affected by the vaccines to date ARE the aged, frail and those with pre-existing conditions. Dying, life threatening and serious adverse reactions.
  • The most “at risk” of “cv19” are the aged, frail and those with pre-existing conditions.

Download the latest data file, or view the data online from the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Select “Download VAERS data” from the option at the bottom of the page.

A FOI request has been made for the comprehensive clinical trial results, including the exclusion criteria (those who could not participate in the trials), and a full ingredients list (including nanoparticle delivery agents). Still waiting, weeks later. See below for published ingredients list “This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs). ”

Dead, deaf, blind, incapacitated, but not on the “news”.

Deaths by vacc!ne that you will NOT hear about on the “news”. From the CDC adverse reactions register.
The following video shows dozens, possibly hundreds of deaths listed on the Vacc!ines Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Anyone can download the data file and look for yourself. Data file downloaded 3rd February showed data from 1st January up to 22nd January 2021, can be saved as Excel spreadsheet.
Download the data file, or view the data online from

The CovidBlog
Read about the latest deaths
And more from around the world:

Do you know anyone in Israel? Call them. Ask them how things are.

The audio above is from Israel. If you think it won’t be coming here, you are a fool. The “Australian Government” is “considering” digital passports. “Considering” = legislation already written.

You can refuse

“Earlier this week, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said he was “troubled” by the relatively low numbers of nursing home workers who have elected to take the vaccine, with DeWine stating that approximately 60% of nursing home staff declined the shot.
Dr. Joseph Varon, chief of critical care at Houston’s United Memorial Medical Center, told NPR in December more than half of the nurses in his unit informed him they would not get the vaccine.
Roughly 55 percent of surveyed New York Fire Department firefighters said they would not get the coronavirus vaccine, the Firefighters Association president said last month.
The Los Angeles Times reported Thursday that hospital and public officials in Riverside, Calif., have been forced to figure out how best to allocate unused doses after an estimated 50% of frontline workers in the county refused the vaccine.
Fewer than half of the hospital workers at St. Elizabeth Community Hospital in Tehama County, Calif., were willing to be vaccinated, and around 20% to 40% of L.A. County’s frontline workers have reportedly declined an opportunity to take the vaccine.
Dr. Nikhila Juvvadi, the chief clinical officer at Chicago’s Loretto Hospital, said that a survey was administered in December, and 40% of the hospital staff said they would not get vaccinated.”

Lets look at the Laws

Biosecurity Act 2015 – explanation by lawyer Serene Teffaha

Please wake up, take a couple of hours to research for yourself.

People need to read the Biosecurity Act 2015, upon which these pieces of legislation hinge. None of it applies, none of it – unless an individual has been assessed by a medical professional or authorised Biosecurity officer, and named in a Biosecurity control order. None of the restrictions apply to any of us.
No restriction on your movements
No restriction on your access to shops, services or travel
No enforcement of masks
No enforcement of quarantine
No enforcement of medical procedures up your nose.

**** IMPORTANT ****

Pursuant to the Biosecurity Act 2015
Federal Register of Legislation |
Section 477(6) provides:
“(6) A determination made under subsection (1) must not require an individual to be subject to a biosecurity measure of a kind set out in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2.
Note: Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 sets out the biosecurity measures that may be included in a human biosecurity control order.”
The emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched, wear a mask (amongst other actions) in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.
These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015.
Section 60 provides:
“Imposing a human biosecurity control order on an individual
(1) The following officers may impose a human biosecurity control order on an individual:
(a) a chief human biosecurity officer;
(b) a human biosecurity officer;
(c) a biosecurity officer.
Note 1: An officer who intends to impose a human biosecurity control order on an individual has certain powers under sections 68 and 69.
Note 2: Before imposing a human biosecurity control order, an officer must be satisfied of the matters referred to in section 34 (the principles).
Note 3: The Director of Human Biosecurity must be notified of the imposition of a human biosecurity control order (see section 67).”
Pursuant to the Biosecurity Act 2015, all biosecurity security measures involving matters of quarantine including isolation, detention (including crossborder and returning travelers), treatment, vaccinations, obtaining bodily samples through testing and examinations, contact tracing and wearing clothing and equipment must not be required on any Australian resident without a proper assessment of their individual risk by an authorised biosecurity officer.
Screenshots of some relevant sections of the Biosecurity Act 2015

For business owners

What legal notification were you served with to give you authority to impose Biosecurity orders on your customers?


Requiring the use of COVIDSafe

(1)  A person commits an offence if the person requires another person to:

                     (a)  download COVIDSafe to a communication device; or

                     (b)  have COVIDSafe in operation on a communication device; or

                     (c)  consent to uploading COVID app data from a communication device to the National COVIDSafe Data Store.

Penalty:  Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.

             (2)  A person commits an offence if the person:

                     (a)  refuses to enter into, or continue, a contract or arrangement with another person (including a contract of employment); or

                     (b)  takes adverse action (within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009 ) against another person; or

                     (c)  refuses to allow another person to enter:

                              (i)  premises that are otherwise accessible to the public; or

                             (ii)  premises that the other person has a right to enter; or

                     (d)  refuses to allow another person to participate in an activity; or

                     (e)  refuses to receive goods or services from another person, or insists on providing less monetary consideration for the goods or services; or

                      (f)  refuses to provide goods or services to another person, or insists on receiving more monetary consideration for the goods or services;

on the ground that, or on grounds that include the ground that, the other person:

                     (g)  has not downloaded COVIDSafe to a communication device; or

                     (h)  does not have COVIDSafe in operation on a communication device; or

                      (i)  has not consented to uploading COVID app data from a communication device to the National COVIDSafe Data Store.

Penalty:  Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.

             (3)  To avoid doubt:

                     (a)  subsection (2) is a workplace law for the purposes of the Fair Work Act 2009 ; and

                     (b)  the benefit that the other person derives because of an obligation of the person under subsection (2) is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3-1 of that Act.”


Recognition and equality before the law

(1)     Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law.

(2)     Every person has the right to enjoy his or her human rights without discrimination.

(3)     Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination and has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination.

(4)     Measures taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination do not constitute discrimination.”


**** IMPORTANT ****

mRNA “vacc!ines”

Is the proposed “vacc!ne” really a vacc!ne… or gene therapy? Irreversible DNA changing, experimental, untested, and does not provide immunisation against any disease. From the Oxford definition of vacc!ine “and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease”. Long term effects tested? No. Published comprehensive trial results of the miniscule samples of 100% healthy candidates? Not even that, not even (so far) via a FOI from the TGA. Zilch.
Would the population be receptive to an “investigational” and untested “medicine” by choice?

From the Moderna website (including the image above):

Our mRNA Medicines – The ‘Software of Life’
When we have a concept for a new mRNA medicine and begin research, fundamental components are already in place.

Generally, the only thing that changes from one potential mRNA medicine to another is the coding region – the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein. Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.

We are leveraging the flexibility afforded by our platform and the fundamental role mRNA plays in protein synthesis to pursue mRNA medicines for a broad spectrum of diseases.


Let’s look at the AstraZeneca jab:

[Video″ removed from Rumble]

From the UK gov website on the AZ shot, information for health professionals:

1. Name of the medicinal product

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, solution for injection in multidose container

COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1 S [recombinant])

2. Qualitative and quantitative composition

One dose (0.5 ml) contains:

COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S* recombinant) 5 × 10^10 viral particles (vp)

*Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS CoV 2 Spike (S) glycoprotein. Produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells.

This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.


4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation


There is a limited experience with the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women.

Preliminary animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryofetal development, parturition or post natal development; definitive animal studies have not been completed yet. The full relevance of animal studies to human risk with vaccines for COVID-19 remains to be established.

Administration of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and fetus.


It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is excreted in human milk.


Preliminary animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to fertility.

Now, the same information is available from the Australian regulator TGA, but the section on fertility, from the TGA publicly available documents, reads:


COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca

(ChAdOx1-S) solution for injection


ChAdOx1-S (provisional ABN)


Each multi-dose vial contains 5×1011 viral particles (vp) of (ChAdOx1-S a, b) in 5 mL.
One dose (0.5mL) contains 5×1010 vp of (ChAdOx1-Sa, b).

a Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) glycoprotein (GP)

b The vaccine is manufactured using material originally sourced from a human embryo (Human Embryonic Kidney cells: HEK293)

This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
For the full list of excipients, see Section 6.1List of excipients.



Effects on fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca may impact fertility. No data are available.

Use in pregnancy –Category B2
There are a limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women, or women who became pregnant after receiving the vaccine. The data are insufficient to inform on vaccine associated risk.
Download or view the documentation from:


“The UK Govt Admits That COVID Injections Are Basically Pointless Since They Offer No Protection Against Reinfection”

“Oppression knows no bounds: endless masking, lock downs and vaccines

The man behind the pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci, echoed Hancock, warning every vaccine recipient to continue masking up even after the second dose. He even said that two masks are better than one and recommends double masking, even after double vaccination.

Hancock said the first vaccine doesn’t protect anyone. He said it takes three weeks and a second dose before the body learns how to build immunity to coronavirus spike proteins.

But he said masks will be required even after the second dose because “we still don’t know whether you will be able to pass coronavirus on to someone else,” he said.

The UK government is essentially admitting that covid-19 vaccines are pointless and offer zero protection.

If a person can still get sick with covid-19 after vaccination and spread live viral particles through their sputum and aerosols, then the vaccines do not work.”
Full article:

Where did all this start?

Thanks to UNESCO (one of the organisations created by the unelected, self appointed, unaccountable, foreign corporation called the “Un!ted Nat!ons”), our Constitution stopped being taught in schools in the ’70’s. Why? Because they didn’t want future generations to know how they were being SCREWED.

From the Australian Constitution, the Supreme law of this land:

Section 51 (xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;

Section 92. Trade within the Commonwealth to be free. On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among the States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free.

Section 109. Inconsistency of Laws. When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

Section 116. Commonwealth not to legislate in respect religion. The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

The corporation “Australian Government” started trading on 1st July 1973. They effectively mothballed the true Government of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Through the UNIDROIT agreement, our system of law was changed from a system of Common Law and justice, to a system of private contract law, a system of administration. The “Australian Government” are administrators.

Large scale changes to all laws were made to remove references to the Commonwealth and states and territories of the Commonwealth (Statute Law Revision Act 1973 No. 216 of 1973
sample from that document:

Section 25—

Omit from paragraph (1)(b) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (3) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (4) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (5) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (6) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (7) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (9) “of the Commonwealth”.

Section 26—

Omit from paragraph (1)(c) “of the Commonwealth” (wherever occurring).

Omit from paragraph (2)(d) “of the Commonwealth” (wherever occurring).

Section 28—

Omit from paragraph (3)(b) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (6) “of the Commonwealth”.

While looking for the above I also found STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 1974 No. 20 of 1974

End of lesson 1.

The rest is up to you, start researching. A good start would be the Agenda21 agreement. The “Australian Government” signed Australia up to Agenda21 in 1992.
The Lima Agreement of 1975 was designed to destroy the Australian manufacturing industries and move them to “poor” nations ie China.
The United Nations (a foreign, self appointed, unelected corporation) are within our Parliaments officially, to ensure THEIR goals are met, not Australia’s or Australian’s. and check out the gem titled “Bringing the UN into Victorian Communities”

If you want a new website, logos, brochures or business cards – proceed to original Redback Graphics web content.


By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

New laws created by the EU require we notify you if cookies are being used. The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings in your browser, or you click "Accept" then you are consenting to this.