The gloves are off folks.
Do you KNOW what is going on in this world?

Housekeeping first:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights | Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

UNFUNDED Doctors collaborating all around the world to expose the truth are being silenced. LISTEN to them.

Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM is a PRO VACCINE professional. This man probably has more professional vaccine development, immunology and virology experience than ALL of the Australian “Health Ministers” and “Chief Medical Officers” COMBINED.

His CV includes:

GSK Biologicals:
Senior Project Leader Adolescent Vaccine Projects
New Biotech Vaccine Development and QC-QA Manager
Head of Adjuvant Technologies and Alternative Deliveries, R&D

Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics:
Director Research Program Leader and Head of Adjuvants

Solvay Biologicals:
Global Project Director Influenza Vaccines

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF):
Senior Program Officer, Global Health, Vaccine Discovery

Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI):
Program Manager

UNIVAC:
Chief Innovation & Scientific Officer

German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF):
Head of Vaccine Development Office

VARECO:
Managing Director

He is PRO VACCINES.
He is now WARNING everyone to STOP THESE COVID 19 VACCINES otherwise there will be a GLOBAL CATASTROPHE – unmatched.

17.31 minutes to SAVE YOUR LIFE


BitChute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/meuHf0DLD3Na/

Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations-Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM

“Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To all authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entre world population.

I am all but an antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.

The present extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19 pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.

As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic.

Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster.

Racing against the clock, I am completing my scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately, likely to come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a summary of my findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine Summit in Ohio on LinkedIn.”
Read the entire open letter: https://fos-sa.org/2021/03/12/open-letter-to-the-who-immediately-halt-all-covid-19-mass-vaccinations-geert-vanden-bossche-dmv-phd/

Dr Christiane Northrup, M.D.

Credentials
Diplomate, American Board of Holistic Medicine, 2005
Cofounder, Women to Women in Yarmouth, Maine, 1985 – 1997
Assistant Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vermont College of Medicine at Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, 1982 – 2001
Diplomate, American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology 1981 – Present
Private Practice Obstetrics & Gynecology, Portland and Yarmouth, Maine, 1979 – 2005
Clinical Instructor, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, June 1979 – June 1982
Associate Clinical Professor, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, 1979 – 1980
Director of Resident’s Outpatient Obstetrics & Gynecology Clinic, St. Margaret’s Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, 1979 –1980
M.D., Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, 1975

Professional Appointments
Alliance for Human Research Protection, Distinguished Advisory Board, 2019 – Present
Intact America, Board of Health Professionals 2010 – Present
A Woman’s Nation, Advisory Committee, 2009 – Present
Family Circle, Advisory Board, 2006 – 2009
Friends of the Birth Center, Advisory Board, 2007 – 2008
Heal Breast Cancer Foundation, Advisory Board, 2007 – 2010
Pilates Style, Advisory Board, 2006 – Present
Heartwings Foundation, Board of Trustees, 2004 – 2009
The Red Web Foundation, Advisory Board Member, 2004 – Present
American Holistic Health Association, Board of Advisors, 2003 – Present
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, Advisory Board, 1994 – 2001
Natural Health Magazine, Advisory Board Member, 1986 – 2009

Professional Organizations
Proprioceptive Writing Center, Portland, Maine Board of Trustees, 1987-1989
American Holistic Medical Association
President, June 1986 – March 1988
Co-President with Bernie Siegel, M.D., March 1988 – March 1990
Secretary, June 1986 – March 1988
New England Trustee, June 1984 – June 1986
Trustee at Large, June 1982 – June 1984
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981 – Present

https://www.drnorthrup.com/

Dr Christiane Northrup MUST WATCH video.


BitChute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/MlSRPSgyKpAI/

“Efficacy”?

Efficacy, how do they get 75-95% “efficacy”. Well, you should ask. The following screenshot is from the video below that, and is from the manufacturer’s data. The “efficacy” is calculated by the % of people who do NOT develop coronavirus symptoms within a period of time. What they don’t use in that calculation is the vs non “vaccinated”, of which is almost identical result. Both groups result in very similar results of people who develop symptoms of a coronavirus within a period of time. So how effective is an injection of untested, experimental GMO at preventing disease vs non injected? Virtually 0-5% MAYBE.

Watch just 5 minutes of this to probably save your life. Interview with Dr Richard Fleming, Phd, MD, JD, 13th April 2021.


BitChute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ACOICRGsgiIq/
UNexiteer BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/QjxICckmZ9ls/

Only 4.38 minutes. If this doesn’t make you want to look into it further, look for the clinical trial results in HUMANS that tested for autoimmune responses to subsequent coronavirus contact. Good luck.


BitChute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/JmOsp1zvoDJ0/
UNexiteer BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/QjxICckmZ9ls/

Part 1 (only 27 minutes, please watch) source https://brandnewtube.com/v/75grLS
Copy at Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/yRR9bjXFLTJw/

Part 2 (54 minutes) in response to the “Antivaxxer” bashing from msm after Pt 1 was launched.
Source: https://brandnewtube.com/v/WxqenF
Copy at BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rc3RfJgw9V8k/

Dr Sherr! Tenpenny explains the immediate and more importantly AFTER effects of the jab. Do your own research!! It’s there if you want to KNOW.


BitChute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WnSgERrDPhHh/
UNexiteer BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/QjxICckmZ9ls/

 

Did you ever wonder why the “government” never promote any treatments, good food or exercise, sunshine, anything that would treat or prevent symptoms of cv and build natural immunity?
They banned HCQ, made it illegal for MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS to prescribe, even though it has been PROVEN  to SAVE lives.
Another readily available, safe and cheap treatment is available… do you hear about it from the “government” or the “Chief Medical Officer”?

“Treat the severely ill; skip the problematic vaccines
Vaccination is not fool proof. Vaccinated patients are testing positive for COVID-19. Doctors can choose to treat the 3 in 10,000 COVID-19 severely infected patients who are at risk for a mortal outcome with lysine rather than needlessly vaccinate billions of people. Mass vaccination would not be needed, nor would lockdowns, quarantines and questionable mass face mask use be required.
The pandemic would be rapidly extinguished by a public information campaign regarding lysine-rich foods and dietary supplements. The public can take action on its own today without adverse consequences. Literally, trillions of dollars would be saved worldwide. If not for COVID-19, at least for herpes infections.
The shame is on the World Health Organization with a budget of $8.482 billion or the Centers For Disease Control with a budget of $7.875 billion that overlook safe and economical cures like lysine. This report serves as evidence the world is being gamed to plunder the masses of their health and wealth.
The people of the world need to stop heeding advice from public health officials and practice preventive medicine on their own volition.“
Article: https://principia-scientific.com/a-cheap-new-covid-cure-just-did-away-any-need-for-a-vaccine/
.
.
Look forward to June, July, August 2021.
Covid-21, a “new deadly virus” will start killing millions of people. Mainstream media will be flooding the airwaves with deadly virus AND the hospitals WILL be overrun, people WILL be dying from a coronavirus… but they will be, in the beginning, ALL cv19 jabbed people. They will be dying from Autoimmune disease once they come into contact with any run of the mill coronavirus. Their natural immunity system has been re-engineered by the injected “immunity” and their body will die from the internal war.
Try and find trial reports for the testing of mRNA vaccines for autoimmune disease in humans.. There are none. If you’re lucky, you might find the trial reports for the testing of mRNA vaccines on animals (cats and ferrets), which were abandoned due to the high mortality rates.
.
.
What about Gates (and complete immunity from prosecution), GAVI, the WHO and the UN? Well, you should know.

The patents of cv and cv testing and detection

.

Your voice

Are you willing to accept an injection of untested experimental gene therapy treatment?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We’ll get back to “Emergency Use” shortly, but first, watch this.
Aluminium nanoparticles used as delivery agents in vacc!ines.
This video had to be recorded by a phone as it has been blocked and banned from all platforms.

The PCR test

Preamble by Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test.

Medical professionals on masks

Americas Frontline Doctors Alliance on masks

Phds, Professors talk about the “vacc!ne”


Professor Dolores Cah!ll explains how the mRNA gene therapy interacts with the body’s own immune system, and how your body may attack you from within. UNTESTED, EXPERIMENTAL gene therapies, not “vacc!nes”. Read, research, LEARN for your kid’s futures.

“Among people over 80, maybe about 2.5% will experience severe side effects, adverse events where people cannot work or live life normally.

Then with the 2nd vaccination it could be 1 in 10 or ten percent.  For the over 80-year-olds, I would think that 80% of them would have life-limiting reactions or die when they come across the messenger RNA again.

For others (not elderly) it could be half of the people who could be severely harmed.

What it does is… this gene therapy or medical device is setting up an autoimmune disease chronically.  It’s like injecting people who have nut allergies with peanuts.”

OK, so where are the test results to disprove this you should ask. There aren’t any. The VAERS data supports the quotation above by Professor Cah!ll.

  • The initial vacc!ne trials were conducted on 100% healthy, mostly under 70yrs, specifically NOT on aged, frail, or any candidate with a pre-existing condition causing low immunity.
  • The “trial” is being rolled out as they vacc!nate the population. Living guinea pigs.
  • The most adversely affected by the vaccines to date ARE the aged, frail and those with pre-existing conditions. Dying, life threatening and serious adverse reactions.
  • The most “at risk” of “cv19” are the aged, frail and those with pre-existing conditions.

Download the latest data file, or view the data online from the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html Select “Download VAERS data” from the option at the bottom of the page.

A FOI request has been made for the comprehensive clinical trial results, including the exclusion criteria (those who could not participate in the trials), and a full ingredients list (including nanoparticle delivery agents). Still waiting, weeks later. See below for published ingredients list “This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs). ”

Dead, deaf, blind, incapacitated, but not on the “news”.

Deaths by vacc!ne that you will NOT hear about on the “news”. From the CDC adverse reactions register.
The following video shows dozens, possibly hundreds of deaths listed on the Vacc!ines Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Anyone can download the data file and look for yourself. Data file downloaded 3rd February showed data from 1st January up to 22nd January 2021, can be saved as Excel spreadsheet.
Download the data file, or view the data online from https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

The CovidBlog

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/27/cdc-reporting-system-logged-181-deaths-related-to-covid-vaccines-in-three-weeks/
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/27/vaers-florida-healthcare-worker-dies-one-hour-after-second-pfizer-biontech-shot/
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/17/germany-10-senior-citizens-dead-within-four-days-after-pfizer-vaccine/
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/02/12/sara-stickles-28-year-old-has-brain-aneurysm-dead-days-after-second-pfizer-mrna-shot/
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/02/05/something-isnt-right-last-words-of-virginia-grandmother-who-died-hours-after-pfizer-mrna-shot/
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/16/israel-four-dead-13-develop-bells-palsy-after-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines/
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/08/pediatric-assistant-in-portugal-is-dead-two-days-after-taking-pfizer-biontech-covid-vaccine/
Read about the latest deaths https://thecovidblog.com/category/vaccine-deaths/
And more from around the world:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/78-year-old-woman-dies-california-vaccination-site-after-being-n1257885
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/virginia-woman-dies-shortly-after-receiving-coronavirus-vaccine-n1256880

Hearing Tuesday 9 March in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court matter L12182685 – Millin v Vincent Rizzo – Victoria Police
There is no statistical or scientific basis for an Emergency in Victoria or in fact any State of Australia.
Daniel Andrews is relying on the State of Emergency in Victoria for his extensive powers to put people in lockdown, to force them to wear masks (which have been proven scientifically to cause health issues), to close businesses and destroy people’s livelihoods. to arrest people, to fine people and use other draconian measures.
Despite consistently asking, the people of Victoria have never been given the scientific evidence, or the statistics (deaths) that warrant the decision to call a State of Emergency, or the extension of one.
The following questions need to be answered by the Prosecution
1. Why do we need a State of Emergency when Statistics in Australia show that 99.9% of people under the age of 65 survive the virus, 99.5% of 70 year olds (without the complication of other co-morbidities) survive the virus. The age group at risk is the over 80’s?
2. Why do we need a State of Emergency when John Ioannidis of Stanford University – one of the ten most cited scientists in the world has ranked the mortality rate of COVID-19 caused by SARS-COV-2 in the range of that of influenza as early as March 2020? He demonstrated that the worldwide panic at the end of January 2020 regarding an alleged high mortality rate associated with SARS-Cov 2
infection was and is simply unfounded. His paper confirms that the majority of people 65 and under survive the Corona Virus. See: http://bit.ly/3rvOVs4
3. Why are decisions are being made based on no proper data?
4. Why is there a need for a State of Emergency when the Statistics show there have been a small number of deaths in Australia (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2020 deaths from COVID are 909). This is the lowest average death rate in Australia from upper respiratory infections in the past 5 years and apparently last year influenza deaths completely disappeared, Prior to COVID, the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that nearly 3,000 people were dying from influenza?
5. Why is no data given to people in Victoria about how many of the alleged COVID “cases” were properly diagnosed by a doctor apart from having a PCR test since now the WHO are saying the PCR test should not be used as the sole diagnostic tool but merely an aid?
6. Please provide the science for your allegation that asymptomatic cases can transmit the virus?
It has been alleged that there is an asymptomatic form of COVID19. Usually doctors cannot make a proper diagnosis unless a person is displaying symptoms. A study of nearly 10,000,000 people stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found.
Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.”
7. Why are we not told that the vast majority of cases with COVID have survived?
8. Why is the State of Victoria using the PCR test as the sole diagnostic tool and running it at high amplifications, well over the recommended frequency?
The WHO has realized some of the problems with the PCR testing in that many false positives are produced and if the cycles of magnification are too high this test produces incorrect results. WHO has issued two notifications — one on 14th December 2020 and one on 13th January 2021 providing a warning that caution needs to be exercised in using this test, as it is an aid to diagnosis and not the sole diagnostic tool. It is a known a fact that the PCR test is not able to diagnose whether you have an infection from any virus.
See: Version 1 – 7 December 2020 – http://bit.ly/3c7Evsk
Version 2 – 13 January 2021 – http://bit.ly/3qkP68c
9. Why have very few of the purported deaths from COVID ever been given an autopsy to confirm that this is the actual cause of death and not some other comorbidity or accident?
The cause of death in most cases is merely an assumption by one person certifying the death.
10. Why are more Courts around the world deciding that these draconian measures are unconstitutional or unconscionable?
E.g. the Austrian Constitutional Court declared in October, 2020 that Outlawing gatherings with more than 4 people (10 for clubs), requiring people to keep a minimum distance,  Requiring people not to enter premises was unconstitutional and ceased from 31.12.2020 The District Court in Weimar in Germany had a similar view on the restrictions. See – http://bit.ly/30smIqh
German judge Thorsten Schleif calls on citizens to defend themselves against corona fines, as they are hard to follow logically and often in contravention of existing law. A restriction on citizen’s rights can only be executed with sufficient reason, especially since these measures can be continued indefinitely.
The Appeal Court in Lisbon has stated that a proper diagnosis by a doctor needs to be made that a person is infected. A PCR test (which can create a lot of false positive results) is not sufficient.
11. Why has the WHO never suggested that there should be lockdowns and arrests for non-compliance?
A very serious event (the State of Emergency) has taken place that allows people enormous power, which can and is being abused.
People have had their human rights taken away. This situation demands that the State of Emergency is fully justified with statistics that show a high death rate and that if you catch the virus you are likely to die. Neither of these two things is true. Decisions are being made without any reliable data and causing damage to people’s lives.
 

Do you know anyone in Israel? Call them. Ask them how things are.

The audio above is from Israel. If you think it won’t be coming here, you are a fool. The “Australian Government” is “considering” digital passports. “Considering” = legislation already written.

You can refuse

“Earlier this week, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said he was “troubled” by the relatively low numbers of nursing home workers who have elected to take the vaccine, with DeWine stating that approximately 60% of nursing home staff declined the shot.
Dr. Joseph Varon, chief of critical care at Houston’s United Memorial Medical Center, told NPR in December more than half of the nurses in his unit informed him they would not get the vaccine.
Roughly 55 percent of surveyed New York Fire Department firefighters said they would not get the coronavirus vaccine, the Firefighters Association president said last month.
The Los Angeles Times reported Thursday that hospital and public officials in Riverside, Calif., have been forced to figure out how best to allocate unused doses after an estimated 50% of frontline workers in the county refused the vaccine.
Fewer than half of the hospital workers at St. Elizabeth Community Hospital in Tehama County, Calif., were willing to be vaccinated, and around 20% to 40% of L.A. County’s frontline workers have reportedly declined an opportunity to take the vaccine.
Dr. Nikhila Juvvadi, the chief clinical officer at Chicago’s Loretto Hospital, said that a survey was administered in December, and 40% of the hospital staff said they would not get vaccinated.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2021/01/02/large-numbers-of-health-care-and-frontline-workers-are-refusing-covid-19-vaccine/

Lets look at the Laws

Biosecurity Act 2015 – explanation by lawyer Serene Teffaha

Please wake up, take a couple of hours to research for yourself.

People need to read the Biosecurity Act 2015, upon which these pieces of legislation hinge. None of it applies, none of it – unless an individual has been assessed by a medical professional or authorised Biosecurity officer, and named in a Biosecurity control order. None of the restrictions apply to any of us.
No restriction on your movements
No restriction on your access to shops, services or travel
No enforcement of masks
No enforcement of quarantine
No enforcement of medical procedures up your nose.
LOOK IT UP.

**** IMPORTANT ****

Pursuant to the Biosecurity Act 2015
Federal Register of Legislation | https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020C00127
Section 477(6) provides:
“(6) A determination made under subsection (1) must not require an individual to be subject to a biosecurity measure of a kind set out in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2.
Note: Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 sets out the biosecurity measures that may be included in a human biosecurity control order.”
The emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched, wear a mask (amongst other actions) in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.
These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015.
Section 60 provides:
“Imposing a human biosecurity control order on an individual
(1) The following officers may impose a human biosecurity control order on an individual:
(a) a chief human biosecurity officer;
(b) a human biosecurity officer;
(c) a biosecurity officer.
Note 1: An officer who intends to impose a human biosecurity control order on an individual has certain powers under sections 68 and 69.
Note 2: Before imposing a human biosecurity control order, an officer must be satisfied of the matters referred to in section 34 (the principles).
Note 3: The Director of Human Biosecurity must be notified of the imposition of a human biosecurity control order (see section 67).”
Pursuant to the Biosecurity Act 2015, all biosecurity security measures involving matters of quarantine including isolation, detention (including crossborder and returning travelers), treatment, vaccinations, obtaining bodily samples through testing and examinations, contact tracing and wearing clothing and equipment must not be required on any Australian resident without a proper assessment of their individual risk by an authorised biosecurity officer.
Screenshots of some relevant sections of the Biosecurity Act 2015

For business owners

What legal notification were you served with to give you authority to impose Biosecurity orders on your customers?

“PRIVACY ACT 1988 – SECT 94H

Requiring the use of COVIDSafe

(1)  A person commits an offence if the person requires another person to:

                     (a)  download COVIDSafe to a communication device; or

                     (b)  have COVIDSafe in operation on a communication device; or

                     (c)  consent to uploading COVID app data from a communication device to the National COVIDSafe Data Store.

Penalty:  Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.

             (2)  A person commits an offence if the person:

                     (a)  refuses to enter into, or continue, a contract or arrangement with another person (including a contract of employment); or

                     (b)  takes adverse action (within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009 ) against another person; or

                     (c)  refuses to allow another person to enter:

                              (i)  premises that are otherwise accessible to the public; or

                             (ii)  premises that the other person has a right to enter; or

                     (d)  refuses to allow another person to participate in an activity; or

                     (e)  refuses to receive goods or services from another person, or insists on providing less monetary consideration for the goods or services; or

                      (f)  refuses to provide goods or services to another person, or insists on receiving more monetary consideration for the goods or services;

on the ground that, or on grounds that include the ground that, the other person:

                     (g)  has not downloaded COVIDSafe to a communication device; or

                     (h)  does not have COVIDSafe in operation on a communication device; or

                      (i)  has not consented to uploading COVID app data from a communication device to the National COVIDSafe Data Store.

Penalty:  Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.

             (3)  To avoid doubt:

                     (a)  subsection (2) is a workplace law for the purposes of the Fair Work Act 2009 ; and

                     (b)  the benefit that the other person derives because of an obligation of the person under subsection (2) is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3-1 of that Act.”

http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/pa1988108/s94h.html

“CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 – SECT 8

Recognition and equality before the law

(1)     Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law.

(2)     Every person has the right to enjoy his or her human rights without discrimination.

(3)     Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination and has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination.

(4)     Measures taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination do not constitute discrimination.”
http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/cohrara2006433/s8.html

 

**** IMPORTANT ****

mRNA “vacc!ines”

Is the proposed “vacc!ne” really a vacc!ne… or gene therapy? Irreversible DNA changing, experimental, untested, and does not provide immunisation against any disease. From the Oxford definition of vacc!ine “and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease”. Long term effects tested? No. Published comprehensive trial results of the miniscule samples of 100% healthy candidates? Not even that, not even (so far) via a FOI from the TGA. Zilch.
Would the population be receptive to an “investigational” and untested “medicine” by choice?

From the Moderna website (including the image above):

Our mRNA Medicines – The ‘Software of Life’
When we have a concept for a new mRNA medicine and begin research, fundamental components are already in place.

Generally, the only thing that changes from one potential mRNA medicine to another is the coding region – the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein. Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.

We are leveraging the flexibility afforded by our platform and the fundamental role mRNA plays in protein synthesis to pursue mRNA medicines for a broad spectrum of diseases.

 

Let’s look at the AstraZeneca jab:

[Video https://rumble.com/embed/vaiwrx/?pub=4″ removed from Rumble]

From the UK gov website on the AZ shot, information for health professionals:

1. Name of the medicinal product

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, solution for injection in multidose container

COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1 S [recombinant])

2. Qualitative and quantitative composition

One dose (0.5 ml) contains:

COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S* recombinant) 5 × 10^10 viral particles (vp)

*Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS CoV 2 Spike (S) glycoprotein. Produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells.

This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

and:

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation

Pregnancy

There is a limited experience with the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women.

Preliminary animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryofetal development, parturition or post natal development; definitive animal studies have not been completed yet. The full relevance of animal studies to human risk with vaccines for COVID-19 remains to be established.

Administration of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and fetus.

Breastfeeding

It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is excreted in human milk.

Fertility

Preliminary animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to fertility.

Now, the same information is available from the Australian regulator TGA, but the section on fertility, from the TGA publicly available documents, reads:

AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca

(ChAdOx1-S) solution for injection

1 NAME OF THE MEDICINE

ChAdOx1-S (provisional ABN)

2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

Each multi-dose vial contains 5×1011 viral particles (vp) of (ChAdOx1-S a, b) in 5 mL.
One dose (0.5mL) contains 5×1010 vp of (ChAdOx1-Sa, b).

a Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) glycoprotein (GP)

b The vaccine is manufactured using material originally sourced from a human embryo (Human Embryonic Kidney cells: HEK293)

This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
For the full list of excipients, see Section 6.1List of excipients.

and:

4.6 FERTILITY, PREGNANCY AND LACTATION

Effects on fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca may impact fertility. No data are available.

Use in pregnancy –Category B2
There are a limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women, or women who became pregnant after receiving the vaccine. The data are insufficient to inform on vaccine associated risk.
Download or view the documentation from: https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-chadox1-s

 

“The UK Govt Admits That COVID Injections Are Basically Pointless Since They Offer No Protection Against Reinfection”

“Oppression knows no bounds: endless masking, lock downs and vaccines

The man behind the pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci, echoed Hancock, warning every vaccine recipient to continue masking up even after the second dose. He even said that two masks are better than one and recommends double masking, even after double vaccination.

Hancock said the first vaccine doesn’t protect anyone. He said it takes three weeks and a second dose before the body learns how to build immunity to coronavirus spike proteins.

But he said masks will be required even after the second dose because “we still don’t know whether you will be able to pass coronavirus on to someone else,” he said.

The UK government is essentially admitting that covid-19 vaccines are pointless and offer zero protection.

If a person can still get sick with covid-19 after vaccination and spread live viral particles through their sputum and aerosols, then the vaccines do not work.”
Full article: https://humansarefree.com/2021/01/the-uk-govt-admits-that-covid-injections-are-basically-pointless-since-they-offer-no-protection-against-reinfection.html

Where did all this start?

Thanks to UNESCO (one of the organisations created by the unelected, self appointed, unaccountable, foreign corporation called the “Un!ted Nat!ons”), our Constitution stopped being taught in schools in the ’70’s. Why? Because they didn’t want future generations to know how they were being SCREWED.

From the Australian Constitution, the Supreme law of this land:

Section 51 (xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;

Section 92. Trade within the Commonwealth to be free. On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among the States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free.

Section 109. Inconsistency of Laws. When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

Section 116. Commonwealth not to legislate in respect religion. The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

The corporation “Australian Government” started trading on 1st July 1973. They effectively mothballed the true Government of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Through the UNIDROIT agreement, our system of law was changed from a system of Common Law and justice, to a system of private contract law, a system of administration. The “Australian Government” are administrators.

Large scale changes to all laws were made to remove references to the Commonwealth and states and territories of the Commonwealth (Statute Law Revision Act 1973 No. 216 of 1973 https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C1973A00216).
sample from that document:

Section 25—

Omit from paragraph (1)(b) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (3) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (4) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (5) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (6) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (7) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (9) “of the Commonwealth”.

Section 26—

Omit from paragraph (1)(c) “of the Commonwealth” (wherever occurring).

Omit from paragraph (2)(d) “of the Commonwealth” (wherever occurring).

Section 28—

Omit from paragraph (3)(b) “of the Commonwealth”.

Omit from sub-section (6) “of the Commonwealth”.

While looking for the above I also found STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 1974 No. 20 of 1974 https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A00079

End of lesson 1.

The rest is up to you, start researching. A good start would be the Agenda21 agreement. The “Australian Government” signed Australia up to Agenda21 in 1992.
The Lima Agreement of 1975 was designed to destroy the Australian manufacturing industries and move them to “poor” nations ie China.
The United Nations (a foreign, self appointed, unelected corporation) are within our Parliaments officially, to ensure THEIR goals are met, not Australia’s or Australian’s.
www.unaa.org.au and check out the gem titled “Bringing the UN into Victorian Communities” https://unaavictoria.org.au/

Some light reading for lesson 2 (from https://fatherlyadviceandrants.com/2021/03/12/dr-richard-fleming-discusses-the-sars-covid2-vaccines/):

If you want a new website, logos, brochures or business cards – proceed to original Redback Graphics web content.

 

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

New laws created by the EU require we notify you if cookies are being used. The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings in your browser, or you click "Accept" then you are consenting to this.

Close